(Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform

GW Theobald

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
Parliament must clearly decide whether they are mainly concerned with preventing the birth of defective children or with accommodating pregnant women. If they intend to move further than they have done in Scandinavia and give ” abortion rights ” to women they will have to set up special abortion clinics staffed by ” committed” gynaecologists. . . the profession, for its part, must devise simpler and more effective means of birth control and of sterilization, and perhaps be willing to offer the latter to all women who have had two or more children.


Theobald G. (Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform. Br Med J. 1966;1(5493):977-978.

(Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform

DG Withers

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
I should like to question the right of a gynaecologist to refuse to do the work he is employed to do on grounds of moral prejudice. What would be the consequence, I wonder, if a surgeon refused to order blood transfusion on the basis of his beliefs as a Jehovah’s Witness ? It is a well-accepted principle of medical ethics that treatment should not depend on race, colour, or creed of patient or doctor. I maintain, therefore, that it is clearly wrong for a person not prepared to perform abortions to follow a profession which requires him to do so.


Withers D. (Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform. Br Med J. 1966 Apr 16;1(5493):978.

(Correspondence) Abortion law reform

R. M. Marquis

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract

I was very interested to read the excellent report on legalized abortion by the Council of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2 April, p. 850). Two questions, however, arise. . .


Marquis RM.  (Correspondence) Abortion law reform.  Br Med J. 1966 April 16; 1(5493): 977

(Correspondence) Abortion law reform

Terence G. Robinson

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract

I feel myself in broad agreement with the answers given by Mr. Philip Rhodes (2 April, p. 859) to Lord Brain’s points, with the exception of his categorical ” No ” to the question, ” Should the fact that a pregnancy is the result of rape be a ground for its legal termination ? ” . . .I feel that rape per se should be a ground for legal abortion, but at the same time it is important that the flood-gates to abuse should not be opened wide.


Robinson TG.  (Correspondence) Abortion law reform. Br Med J. 1966 April 16; 1(5493): 978

(Correspondence) Abortion law reform

Philip Rhodes

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

I am grateful to Lord Brain (19 March, p. 727) for putting the points in this matter so clearly. Since you ask for wide discussion I put my personal answers to the questions. . . My answers to the questions are necessarily brief for the considerations of your space. A general comment would be that the law needs reform for the sake of the law and not medicine. I have performed abortions for what I and my colleagues have considered to be good reasons. I do not like to perform the operation, and those who assist me like it even less. . .


Rhodes P.  (Correspondence) Abortion law reform. Br Med J. 1966 April 2; 1(5491): 859–860

(Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform

RW Taylor

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
No doubt we could eventually be so conditioned that abortion, or the destruction of any other life too for that matter, gave no concern to our professional consciences. It is at least debatable whether any such alteration, not to say lowering, of our ethical standards would benefit either our patients or ourselves.


Taylor RW. (Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform. Br Med J. 1966;1(5489):738.

Medical Issues in Abortion Law Reform

Lord Brain

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
There remain for consideration some general problems to which very little attention has so far been paid. It is necessary to distinguish (1) the law relating to abortion, (2) professional ethics relating to abortion, and (3) individual ethical standards. Hitherto (1) and (2) have coincided, in that an offence against the law relating to abortion has also been treated as an offence against professional ethics. Personal ethical standards, however, may differ from those of the law or of the profession as a whole. If the law is relaxed the General Medical Council will presumably have to consider whether professional ethical standards should be correspondingly relaxed. Individual judgements, however, may well show a much wider range than in the past, when doctors who were not opposed to abortion in principle were usually prepared to accept the standards laid down by the Bourne judgement. . . Doctors will, of course, remain free to exercise their own judgements in these matters, and the same must apply to the nurses and others who have to cooperate with them.


Brain L. Medical Issues in Abortion Law Reform. Br Med J. 1966;1(5489):727-729.

(Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform

James Campbell

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
In actual fact we know that many primitive tribes have practised abortion and child destruction for long periods. I suggest that Mr. Mills should examine the cultural origin of his feelings, then perhaps he would come to the conclusion that there are many occasions when termination of pregnancy would prevent many years of suffering, so that neither revulsion nor guilt need be felt.


Campbell J. (Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform. Br Med J. 1966 Mar 05;1(5487):613-614.

(Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform

Denis Pells Cocks

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
Nowadays therapeutic abortion is performed relatively rarely for organic disease, and the indications are largely psychiatric with often associated secondary social factors. Whilst some clarification of the old law may be necessary in order that all can understand the situation, we must beware lest in reframing the law this results in the opening of the floodgates in the demand for termination on more liberal grounds.


Cocks DP. (Correspondence) Abortion Law Reform. Br Med J. 1966 Feb 26;1(5486):539.