Nursing Archives - Page 4 of 5 - Protection of Conscience Project Library

The First Ten Principles for the Ethical Administration of Nursing Services

Leah L Curtin

Abstract
At the dawn of the 20th century, postmodern academics stressed the cultural differences among human beings. Philosophers predicated differing value systems based on these cultural differences, and conflicts have arisen among those who hold distinctly different religious traditions. Many people believe there can be no universal system to explain reality and thus form the basis for norms in human behavior. However, at the close of the 20th century scientists and philosophers had come full circle: physics quite literally became metaphysics, and ethical systems made sense. Rush Kidder interviewed two dozen “men and women of good conscience” from around the world and asked them if there is a single set of values that wise people use to make decisions. They answered with a resounding YES! Thus, in addition to the customary principles of beneficence, nonmalfeasance, honesty, and so forth, the author proposes a set of ethical principles based on those universal values, adapted to fit nursing administrators’ dual responsibilities. Ethical decision making and behavior, the author contends, help to reconcile perspectives and interests and to keep values and mission uppermost in one’s mind. In the process, ethical behavior establishes long-term relations of trust and cooperation, which in turn promote consistency and stability in an unstable world..

Curtin LL. The First Ten Principles for the Ethical Administration of Nursing Services. Nurs Adm Q. 2000 Fall;25(1):7-13.

(News) Leak of abortion information creates turmoil at Foothills

Richard Cairney

Canadian Medical Association Journal, CMAJ — Canadian Medical Association Journal

Extract

The Calgary Regional Health Authority (CRHA)has won a court judgement preserving the private, confidential nature of documents concerning genetic terminations of pregnancy that were leaked to Alberta Report by one or more angry pro-life nurses. . . .The controversy erupted after one or more members of the nursing staff at Foothills leaked confidential documents to the magazine. The resulting articles were filled with loaded language — “genetic terminations unquestionably constitute murder” and “the abortionist might well be guilty of culpable homicide” are 2 examples. . . ..

Cairney R. Leak of abortion information creates turmoil at Foothills. Can. Med. Assoc. J.. 1999;161(4):424-425.

Descriptive and Normative Ethics: Conscientious Objection

Tina PH Baker

Abstract
Conscientious objection preserves the personal integrity and wholeness of a health care professional’s character and personality. Professionals are obligated not only to codes of ethics and standards of care that guide their practices, but also to personal values. When professional and personal values conflict with health care delivery, nurses are compelled to object on moral grounds on behalf of themselves and the public they serve.

Baker TP. Descriptive and Normative Ethics: Conscientious Objection. Nurs Manag. (Harrow). 1996;27(10):32DD-32FF

Abortion: the limits of moral repugnance

Leah L Curtin

Abstract
A 28-year-old married woman, gravida 3 para 2002, was transferred to a tertiary care hospital at 27 2/7 weeks gestation for verification of gross fetal anomalies. Ultra-sonography studies showed the child she carried had a dramatic gastroschises, an enlarged heart, and small limb buds for arms. The patient was informed of her fetus’ condition and, after she discussed the situation with her husband, both parents asked that the pregnancy be terminated.

Using prostaglandin, the physician induced labor prematurely in a labor and delivery room suite. Both parents held the child until shortly before its death.

A voluntary abortion this late in pregnancy for nonlethal birth defects caused considerable concern and even distress among the nursing staff on this unit. As a matter of conscience, almost half of the nursing staff refused to care for any patients having elective abortions, and this case raised even more moral questions than usual. Moreover, this couple—and even their family members—received threatening phone calls and letters while the woman was still in the hospital, and the couple reported receiving even more after she returned home.

Curtin LL. Abortion: the limits of moral repugnance. Nurs Manag. 1994 Oct;25(10):22-25.

Consequences for patients of health care professionals’ conscientious actions: the ban on abortions in South Australia

Leslie Cannold

Abstract
The legitimacy of the refusal of South Australian nurses to care for second trimester abortion patients on grounds of conscience is examined as a test case for a theory of permissible limits on the autonomy of health care professionals. In cases of health care professional (HCP) conscientious refusal, it is argued that a balance be struck between the HCPs’ claims to autonomous action and the consequences to them of having their autonomous action restricted, and the entitlement of patients to care and the consequences for them of being refused such care. Conscientious action that results in the disruption or termination of health care services, however, is always impermissible on two grounds. Firstly, because it is at this point that the action ‘… invades a patient’s autonomy, puts a patient at serious risk … [and] treats a patient unjustly’ (1) Secondly, because the consequences of such refusals turn them into political acts-acts of civil disobedience. It is arguable that in order for acts of civil disobedience to be legitimate, certain obligations are required of the dissenter by the community. It is concluded that the actions of the South Australian nurses, which have over the last few years both terminated and disrupted second trimester services, are morally impermissible.

Cannold L. Consequences for patients of health care professionals’ conscientious actions: the ban on abortions in South Australia. J Med Ethics. 1994 Jun;20(2):80-86.

Conscience and Clinical Care

Leah L Curtin

Extract
If the state itself does not presume to order the consciences of its citizens, how can employers, physicians or hierarchical superiors assume such authority? For those in positions of power, it is all too easy to stifle the criticisms and consciences of subordinates by a summons to authority – or by an accusation of insubordination. The irony of it is that whether you succeed or fail in your attempts to force obedience through such tactics, you will have lost your most valuable asset – a man or woman of integrity. Within the ethical, professional and legal restraints to which all of us are subject, we can and must create a system that allows for respectful dissent and conscientious objection.

Curtin LL. Conscience and Clinical Care. Nurs Manag. 1993 Aug;24(8):26-28.

Creating Moral Space for Nurses

Leah L Curtin

Extract
(Lengthy 1983 editorial repeated verbatim in 1993 includes the following) “No nurse should be required to give any drug if (a) she is not competent to give it or (b) she has problems of conscience with regard to its administration. If, for these reasons, a nurse refuses to give a drug, another nurse may do so. The original nurse should receive inservice and/or counseling. If she still has conscientious objections, she should not be coerced. The patient’s right to have/refuse a drug should be protected by meticulous adherence to the principles and procedures of informed consent. However, his right to the drug is not greater than another human being’s (the nurse’s) obligation to practice with integrity. Therefore, if one nurse will not give the drug – the head nurse, coordinator or supervisor should give the drug.” If none of these nurses can, in conscience, administer the drug, then the physician who ordered it must give It himself or find another physician who will do it for him.

Curtin LL. Creating Moral Space for Nurses. Nurs Manag. 1993 Mar;24(3):18-19.

(Correspondence) Readers Advocate Pro-conscience, Not Pro-Choice (Invited response)

Susan Wysocki

Extract
A nurse practitioner’s personal position on this issue is irrelevant in tem1s of the provision of patient care. Our responsibility as nurse practitioners is to provide our patients with information that helps them to make their own decisions based on the constructs of their own beliefs and needs. This does not mean that nurse practitioners who find a patient’s reproductive-health decisions to be in conflict with their own morals and beliefs should be forced to counsel on those choices. Instead, they have a responsibility to ensure that the patient has her needs met with another provider.

Wysocki S. (Correspondence) Readers Advocate Pro-conscience, Not Pro-Choice (Invited response). Nurse Pract. 1992 Oct;17(10):8-9

The Nurse’s Appeal to Conscience

Ellen W Bemal, Patricia S Hoover

Abstract
A case is presented in which a registered nurse caring for a 63-year-old patient in severe pain from terminal cancer disagrees with the attending physician’s order of morphine for fear that it will hasten the patient’s death. The nurse finds herself on duty alone one night when the patient and her daughter request more morphine. Bernal and Hoover contend that, because the nurse apparently took no prior action to explore alternative courses of pain relief for the patient or to make other arrangements for care, her duty of care overrides her appeal to conscience in the immediate situation. Aroskar believes that the nurse in this situation must give the injection, find someone else who can, or contact the physician. She holds, however, that nurses should be allowed to refuse to carry out particular procedures based on an appeal to personal conscience if the decision is founded on accurate information, acceptance of consequences, and advance planning.

Bemal EW, Hoover PS. The Nurse’s Appeal to Conscience. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;25-26. Available from:

(Editorial) A Nurse’s Conscience

Leah L Curtin

(This lengthy editorial was repeated verbatim in 1993. It includes the following)
Extract
“No nurse should be required to give any drug if (a) she is not competent to give it or (b) she has problems of conscience with regard to its administration. If, for these reasons, a nurse refuses to give a drug, another nurse may do so. The original nurse should receive inservice and/or counseling. If she still has conscientious objections, she should not be coerced. The patient’s right to have/refuse a drug should be protected by meticulous adherence to the principles and procedures of informed consent. However, his right to the drug is not greater than another human being’s (the nurse’s) obligation to practice with integrity. Therefore, if one nurse will not give the drug – the head nurse, coordinator or supervisor should give the drug.” If none of these nurses can, in conscience, administer the drug, then the physician who ordered it must give It himself or find another physician who will do it for him..

Curtin LL. (Editorial) A Nurse’s Conscience. Nurs Manag. 1983 Feb;14(2):7-8