Against freedom of conscience

Richard J. Arneson

San Diego Law Review
San Diego Law Review

Abstract
Is there a moral right to freedom of conscience? Should a legal right to freedom of conscience be established in each country on Earth? This essay argues for negative answers to both questions.

Extract
The term freedom of conscience might refer to freedom of thought and the freedom of expression that sustains freedom of thought. In this sense we might affirm the right of each person to form individual opinions about the right and the good, about what we owe one another by way of due consideration of others, and about what is worthy of pursuit in life, on the basis of free discussion of these matters. In the present discussion, these freedoms, important as they might be, are not under consideration. Let us assume freedom of thought and expression are secured. The status of freedom of conscience in the sense that is our concern in this discussion is still wide open.


Arneson RJ. Against freedom of conscience. 47 San Diego L. Rev. 1015 2010

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *