Martin Luther at the Bedside

Nancy Berlinger

The Hastings Center Report
The Hastings Center Report

Extract
Media coverage of conscientious objection tends to cast the refusing health care provider in the role of Martin Luther at the Diet of Worms: Here I stand, I can do no other (emphasis on the “I”). Commentators also do this, parsing the rights and responsibilities (but mostly the rights) in a dyadic relationship: Providers versus patients. Paternalism versus autonomy. “I believe” versus “I want.” . . .

Conscientious objection in medicine is not merely a right to be invoked at the bedside, nor a problem to be held in check through a pro forma conscience clause. Rather, [David H] Smith reminds us, openly discussing the nature of providers’ moral objections, while keeping the needs of the suffering person
uppermost, is a “difficult and unglamorous” communal
responsibility of “morally serious people.” Amen.


Berlinger N. Martin Luther at the Bedside. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007;37(2).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *