Defining the limits of conscientious objection in health care

J Andrew West

Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine
Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine

Extract
I will argue that we should prefer narrow conscience clauses because they (1) respect patients’ right to informed consent and (2) reduce risks to vulnerable populations. I will then propose and defend an example of what a narrow conscience clause might look like. The clause I propose allows: (1) any person (2) directly involved in providing (3) nonemergency medical treatment or service (4) to refuse to provide the treatment or service in question, so long as the person (5) objects on moral or religious grounds and (6) cooperates in the transfer or referral of the patient to a willing provider. Before I turn to these arguments, a brief overview of the genesis and evolution of conscience clauses in medicine is in order.


West JA. Defining the limits of conscientious objection in health care. Newsletter Phil Med. 2005 Fall;5(1):25-34.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *