(Correspondence) Abortion law reform

Philip Rhodes

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

I am grateful to Lord Brain (19 March, p. 727) for putting the points in this matter so clearly. Since you ask for wide discussion I put my personal answers to the questions. . . My answers to the questions are necessarily brief for the considerations of your space. A general comment would be that the law needs reform for the sake of the law and not medicine. I have performed abortions for what I and my colleagues have considered to be good reasons. I do not like to perform the operation, and those who assist me like it even less. . .


Rhodes P.  (Correspondence) Abortion law reform. Br Med J. 1966 April 2; 1(5491): 859–860

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *