(Correspondence) A question of conscience

R Salm

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
I was not concerned with the rights and wrongs of abortions; the point I made was that if an individual, or a minority group, contracted out of this service the burden on the remaining consultants (gynaecologists and anesthetists) would be correspondingly increased and that it is understandable that employing authorities will tend to avoid creating a situation which is fraught with friction and dissatisfaction. I would agree that it is a further illustration of the potential dangers of an inflexible monopoly employer.


Salm R. (Correspondence) A question of conscience. Br Med J. 1976;2(6029):235.


(Correspondence) A question of conscience

R Salm

British Medical Journal, BMJ
British Medical Journal

Extract
R Walley’s article (12 June, p 1456) makes sad reading, for he is both illogical and, if I may say so, a little selfish. The will of the people, as expressed through Parliament, now lays down that certain abortion facilities shall be provided in the NHS, and the area health authorities have the duty to see that this regulation is implemented. In all fairness, it is wrong of Mr Walley to object if the authorities prefer to engage staff who are willing to comply with the current service requirements.


Salm R. (Correspondence) A question of conscience. Br Med J. 1976;1(6025):1593b.