Hilde Buiting, Johannes Van Delden, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Judith Rietjens, Mette Rurup, Donald Van Tol, Joseph Gevers,Paul Van Der Maas,Agnes Van Der Heide
Abstract
Background: An important principle underlying the Dutch Euthanasia Act is physicians’ responsibility to alleviate patients’ suffering. The Dutch Act states that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are not punishable if the attending physician acts in accordance with criteria of due care. These criteria concern the patient’s request, the patient’s suffering (unbearable and hopeless), the information provided to the patient, the presence of reasonable alternatives, consultation of another physician and the applied method of ending life. To demonstrate their compliance, the Act requires physicians to report euthanasia to a review committee. We studied which arguments Dutch physicians use to substantiate their adherence to the criteria and which aspects attract review committees’ attention. . . .
Conclusion: Dutch physicians substantiate their adherence to the criteria in a variable way with an emphasis on physical symptoms. The information they provide is in most cases sufficient to enable adequate review. Review committees’ control seems to focus on (unbearable) suffering and on procedural issues.
Buiting H, Delden JV, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Rietjens J, Rurup M, Tol DV et al. Reporting of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands: Descriptive study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2009;10(1).