Ryan E Lawrence Archives - Protection of Conscience Project Library

Obstetrician-gynecologists’ beliefs about when pregnancy begins

Grace S Chung, Ryan E Lawrence, Kenneth A Rasinski, John D Yoon, Farr A Curlin

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess obstetrician- gynecologists’ regarding their beliefs about when pregnancy begins and to measure characteristics that are associated with believing that pregnancy begins at implantation rather than at conception.

Study Design: We mailed a questionnaire to a stratified, random sample of 1800 practicing obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States. The outcome of interest was obstetrician-gynecologists’ views of when pregnancy begins. Response options were (1) at conception, (2) at implantation of the embryo, and (3) not sure. Primary predictors were religious affiliation, the importance of religion, and a moral objection to abortion.

Results: The response rate was 66% (1154/1760 physicians). One-half of US obstetrician-gynecologists (57%) believe pregnancy begins at conception. Fewer (28%) believe it begins at implantation, and 16% are not sure. In multivariable analysis, the consideration that religion is the most important thing in one’s life (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.20.9) and an objection to abortion (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.20.9) were associated independently and inversely with believing that pregnancy begins at implantation.

Conclusion: Obstetrician-gynecologists’ beliefs about when pregnancy begins appear to be shaped significantly by whether they object to abortion and by the importance of religion in their lives.

Chung GS, Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ beliefs about when pregnancy begins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):132.e1-132.e7.

Adolescents, contraception, and confidentiality: a national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists

RE Lawrence, Kenneth A Rasinski, John D Yoon, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
Background
Given recent legislative efforts to require parental notification for the provision of reproductive health care to minors, we sought to assess how ob/gyns respond to requests for confidential contraceptive services.

Study Design
Mailed survey of 1800 U.S. Obstetrician-Gynecologists, utilizing a vignette where a 17-year-old college freshman requests birth control pills and does not want her parents to know. Criterion variables were the likelihood of: encouraging her to abstain from sexual activity until she is older; persuading her to involve her parents in this decision; and prescribing contraceptives without notifying her parents. Covariates included physicians’ religious, demographic, and clinical characteristics.

Results
Response rate 66%. Most (94%) would provide contraceptives without notifying her parents. Half (47%) would encourage her to involve a parent, and half (54%) would advise abstinence until she is older. Physicians who frequently attend religious services were more likely to encourage her to involve her parents (OR 1.9), and to abstain from sex until she is older (OR 4.4), but equally likely to provide the contraceptives.

Conclusions
Most obstetrician-gynecologists will provide adolescents with contraceptives without notifying their parents.

Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Adolescents, contraception, and confidentiality: a national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists. Contraception. 2011;84(3):259-265.

Obstetrician–gynecologists’ beliefs about safe-sex and abstinence counseling

RE Lawrence, Kenneth A Rasinski, John D Yoon, Farr A Curlin

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract
Objective
To examine obstetrician–gynecologists’ beliefs about safe-sex and abstinence counseling.

Methods
Between October 2008 and January 2009, a survey was mailed to a national randomized sample of 1800 practicing US obstetrician–gynecologists. Study variables were agreement with 2 statements. (1) “If physicians counsel patients about safe-sex practices, the patients will be less likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors”. (2) “If physicians counsel patients about abstinence, the patients will be much less likely to engage in sexual activity”. Covariates included demographic, clinical, and religious characteristics of the physician.

Results
The response rate was 66% (1154/1760 eligible physicians). Most respondents somewhat (62%) or strongly (25%) agreed that counseling patients about safe-sex practices makes patients less likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors. Fewer agreed strongly (3%) or somewhat (28%) that counseling patients about abstinence makes patients less likely to engage in sexual activity. The belief that safe-sex counseling reduces risky behaviors was less common among males (odds ratio [OR] 0.6) and more common among immigrants (OR 2.0). Religious physicians were more likely to believe that abstinence counseling reduces sexual activity (OR 2.2–5.3).

Conclusions
Most obstetrician–gynecologists believed that counseling about safe sex is effective, and a significant minority endorsed abstinence counseling.

Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Obstetrician–gynecologists’ beliefs about safe-sex and abstinence counseling. Int J Gyn Obst 2011; 114(3):281-285.

Obstetrician-gynecologists’ views on contraception and natural family planning: a national survey

RE Lawrence, Kenneth A Rasinski, John D Yoon, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
Objective
To characterize beliefs about contraception among obstetrician-gynecologists (Ob/Gyns).

Study design
National mailed survey of 1800 U.S. Ob/Gyns. Criterion variables were whether physicians have a moral or ethical objection to – and whether they would offer – six common contraceptive methods. Covariates included physician demographic and religious characteristics.

Results
1154 of 1760 eligible Ob/Gyns responded (66%). Some Ob/Gyns object to intrauterine devices (4.4% object, 3.6% would not offer), progesterone implants and/or injections (1.7% object, 2.1% would not offer), tubal ligations (1.5% object, 1.5% would not offer), oral contraceptive pills (1.3% object, 1.1% would not offer), condoms (1.3% object, 1.8% would not offer), and the diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide (1.3% object, 3.3% would not offer). Religious physicians were more likely to object (OR 7.4) and to refuse to provide a contraceptive (OR 1.9).

Conclusion
Controversies about contraception are ongoing, but among Ob/Gyns objections and refusals to provide contraceptives are infrequent.

Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ views on contraception and natural family planning: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(2):124e1-124e7.

Factors influencing physicians’ advice about female sterilization in USA: a national survey

RE Lawrence, Kenneth A Rasinski, John D Yoon, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
Background
Tubal ligation can be a controversial method of birth control, depending on the patient’s circumstances and the physician’s beliefs.

Methods
In a national survey of 1800 US obstetrician-gynecologist (Ob/Gyn) physicians, we examined how patients’ and physicians’ characteristics influence Ob/Gyns’ advice about, and provision of, tubal ligation. Physicians were presented with a vignette in which a patient requests tubal ligation. The patient’s age, gravida/parity and her husband’s agreement/disagreement were varied in a factorial experiment. Criterion variables were whether physicians would discourage tubal ligation, and whether physicians would provide the surgery.

Results
The response rate was 66% (1154/1760). Most Ob/Gyns (98%) would help the patient to obtain tubal ligation, although 9–70% would attempt to dissuade her, depending on her characteristics. Forty-five percent of physicians would discourage a G2P1 (gravida/parity) woman, while 29% would discourage a G4P3 woman. Most physicians (59%) would discourage a 26-year-old whose husband disagreed, while 32% would discourage a 26-year-old whose husband agreed. For a 36-year-old patient, 47% would discourage her if her husband disagreed, while only 10% would discourage her if her husband agreed. Physicians’ sex had no significant effect on advice about tubal ligation.

Conclusions
Regarding patients who seek surgical sterilization, physicians’ advice varies based on patient age, parity and spousal agreement but almost all Ob/Gyns are willing to provide or help patients obtain surgical sterilization if asked. An important limitation of the study is that a brief vignette, while useful for statistical analysis, is a rough approximation of an actual clinical encounter.

Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Factors influencing physicians’ advice about female sterilization in USA: a national survey. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):106-111.

Obstetrician-gynecologist physicians’ beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey

Ryan E Lawrence, Kenneth A Rasinski, John D Yoon, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
Background: Although emergency contraception (EC) is available without a prescription, women still rely on doctors’ advice about its safety and effectiveness. Yet little is known about doctors’ beliefs and practices in this area.

Study design: We surveyed 1800 US obstetrician-gynecologists. Criterion variables were doctors’ beliefs about EC’s effects on pregnancy rates, and patients’ sexual practices. We also asked which women are offered EC. Predictors were demographic, clinical and religious characteristics.

Results: Response rate was 66% (1154/1760). Most (89%) believe EC access lowers unintended pregnancy rates. Some believe women use other contraceptives less (27%), initiate sex at younger ages (12%) and have more sexual partners (15%). Half of physicians offer EC to all women (51%), while others offer it never (6%) or only after sexual assault (6%). Physicians critical of EC, males and religious physicians were more likely to offer it never or only after sexual assault (odds ratios 2.1-12).

Conclusion: Gender, religion and divergent beliefs about EC’s effects shape physicians’ beliefs and practices.

Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Obstetrician-gynecologist physicians’ beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey. Contraception. 2010;82(324-330.

Religious Hospitals and Primary Care Physicians: Conflicts over Policies for Patient Care

Debra B Stulberg, Ryan E Lawrence, Jason Shattuck, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
BACKGROUND
Religiously affiliated hospitals provide nearly 20% of US beds, and many prohibit certain end-of-life and reproductive health treatments. Little is known about physician experiences in religious institutions.
OBJECTIVE
Assess primary care physicians’ experiences and beliefs regarding conflict with religious hospital policies for patient care.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey.
PARTICIPANTS
General internists, family physicians, and general practitioners from the AMA Masterfile.
MAIN MEASURES
In a questionnaire mailed in 2007, we asked physicians whether they had worked in a religiously affiliated hospital or practice, whether they had experienced conflict with the institution over religiously based patient care policies and how they believed physicians should respond to such conflicts. We used chi-square and multivariate logistic regression to examine associations between physicians’ demographic and religious characteristics and their responses.
KEY RESULTS
Of 879 eligible physicians, 446 (51%) responded. In analyses adjusting for survey design, 43% had worked in a religiously affiliated institution. Among these, 19% had experienced conflict over religiously based policies. Most physicians (86%) believed when clinical judgment conflicts with religious hospital policy, physicians should refer patients to another institution. Compared with physicians ages 26–29 years, older physicians were less likely to have experienced conflict with religiously based policies [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) compared with 30–34 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.11); 35–46 years: 0.07 (0.01–0.72); 47–60 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.10)]. Compared with those who never attend religious services, those who do attend were less likely to have experienced conflict [attend once a month or less: odds ratio 0.06 (0.01–0.29); attend twice a month or more: 0.22 (0.05–0.98)]. Respondents with no religious affiliation were more likely than others to believe doctors should disregard religiously based policies that conflict with clinical judgment (13% vs. 3%; p = 0.005).
Conclusions
Hospitals and policy-makers may need to balance the competing claims of physician autonomy and religiously based institutional policies.

Stulberg DB, Lawrence RE, Shattuck J, Curlin FA. Religious Hospitals and Primary Care Physicians: Conflicts over Policies for Patient Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):725-730. Available from:

Physicians’ beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey

Ryan E Lawrence, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore physicians’ beliefs about whether physicians sometimes have a professional obligation to provide medical services even if doing so goes against their conscience, and to examine associations between physicians’ opinions and their religious and ethical commitments.

METHOD: A survey was mailed in 2007 to a stratified random sample of 1,000 U.S. primary care physicians, selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. . . .

RESULTS: The response rate was 51% (446/879 delivered questionnaires). Forty-two percent and 22% believed they are never and sometimes, respectively, obligated to do what they personally believe is wrong, and 36% agreed with both statements. Physicians who are more religious are more likely to believe that physicians are never obligated to do what they believe is wrong (58% and 31% of those with high and low intrinsic religiosity, respectively; multivariate odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.2). Those with moral objections to any of three controversial practices were more likely to hold that physicians should never do what they believe is wrong.

CONCLUSION: A substantial minority of physicians do not believe there is ever a professional obligation to do something they personally believe is wrong.

Lawrence RE, Curlin FA. Physicians’ beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey.. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1276-1282.

Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey

RE Lawrence, Farr A Curlin

Abstract
Background: Patient autonomy has been promoted as the most important principle to guide difficult clinical decisions. To examine whether practising physicians indeed value patient autonomy above other considerations, physicians were asked to weight patient autonomy against three other criteria that often influence doctors’ decisions. Associations between physicians’ religious characteristics and their weighting of the criteria were also examined.

Methods: Mailed survey in 2007 of a stratified random sample of 1000 US primary care physicians, selected from the American Medical Association masterfile. Physicians were asked how much weight should be given to the following: (1) the patient’s expressed wishes and values, (2) the physician’s own judgment about what is in the patient’s best interest, (3) standards and recommendations from professional medical bodies and (4) moral guidelines from religious traditions.

Results: Response rate 51% (446/879). Half of physicians (55%) gave the patient’s expressed wishes and values “the highest possible weight”. In comparative analysis, 40% gave patient wishes more weight than the other three factors, and 13% ranked patient wishes behind some other factor. Religious doctors tended to give less weight to the patient’s expressed wishes. For example, 47% of doctors with high intrinsic religious motivation gave patient wishes the “highest possible weight”, versus 67% of those with low (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8).

Conclusions: Doctors believe patient wishes and values are important, but other considerations are often equally or more important. This suggests that patient autonomy does not guide physicians’ decisions as much as is often recommended in the ethics literature.

Lawrence RE, Curlin FA. Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey. J Med Ethics. 2009;35, 214-218.

The Moral Significance of Claims of Conscience in Healthcare (Conscience in Medicine)

Mark R Wicclair

Extract
Contrary to what Lawrence and Curlin (2007) suggest, it is not primarily disagreement about the nature of “the conscience” that underlies the controversy about whether and when health professionals should be allowed to refuse to provide services that violate their ethical beliefs. Rather, the primary source of disagreement is over the professional obligations of physicians, pharmacists and other healthcare providers and how to resolve conflicts between those obligations and healthcare professionals’ interest in maintaining their moral integrity.

Wicclair MR. The Moral Significance of Claims of Conscience in Healthcare (Conscience in Medicine). Am J Bioeth. 2007;7(1):30-31.